- soteriology
-
In Christian theology, soteriology concerns Jesus’ accomplishment of God’s saving plan for humanity. Jesus’ saving activity extends across his entire life—from birth through public ministry to death and resurrection. The claim is that through these events, something decisive happened that fundamentally altered the human condition and made genuine transformation possible.
The Dictionary Definition of soteriology
soteriology (Gk., soteria, salvation) Branch of theology dealing with salvation, including atonement, grace, original sin, redemption, repentance, justification, regeneration, adoption, initial sanctification, and final glorification. 1Kurian, G. T. (2001). In Nelson’s new Christian dictionary: the authoritative resource on the Christian world. Thomas Nelson Publishers.
A more useful definition of soteriology
As if the concept wasn’t already difficult, things get even messier when we consider that Protestants and Catholics have different doctrines about some of this salvation plan in the Bible.
When I started my research, I found the Catholic “version” first, and so will present it first. That will be followed by the results of further research to identify the differences from a Protestant point of view.
I’ll use the adjacent image as an analogy. Before we become Christians, we’re on the left side. It’s dark. Cloud. The shore is covered with sharp rocks. It’s a dangerous place.
But you can see the land on the other side of the water. The sun is out. Bright colored plants and tree cover it. It’s beautiful. But how can you get over there?
And that’s the question soteriology answers. As with so many journeys in life though, if we ask three people how to get from point A to point B, we’ll likely get three different answers. It’s those three different answers that we’ll examine below.
Catholic beliefs on soteriology
Q: Can you give me a description of what soteriology is that goes beyond a definition, so it has at least some meaning to a non-believer?
🤖✨ Soteriology addresses a fundamental human problem: the question of whether people can fix what’s broken in themselves and their world, or whether they need outside help.
The doctrine rests on the premise that human existence requires salvation – not merely because people are finite and limited, but because of guilt arising from harmful choices and actions.1 A non-believer might frame this differently: humans face real brokenness – psychological, relational, moral, existential – and the question is whether self-help, education, social reform, or individual willpower can resolve it.
Christianity claims that humans cannot save themselves through their own efforts; rather, the power to save comes exclusively from God.1 This is where soteriology becomes distinctive. Rather than offering techniques for self-improvement, it proposes that transformation requires something external – a power beyond human capacity that enters human history to accomplish what humans cannot accomplish alone.
In Christian theology, soteriology concerns Jesus’ accomplishment of God’s saving plan for humanity.1 Jesus’ saving activity extends across his entire life – from birth through public ministry to death and resurrection.1 The claim is that through these events, something decisive happened that fundamentally altered the human condition and made genuine transformation possible.
The effects of this redemption include liberation from slavery to sin, the Law, and destructive powers; spiritual rebirth; justification; adoption into God’s family; and the gifts of peace, joy, life, and truth.1 For a non-believer, this might translate to: soteriology proposes that humans can experience radical inner freedom, restored relationships, purpose, and peace – not through their own striving but through participating in something Christ accomplished.
The core insight is that soteriology answers the question: Who fixes what’s broken? Christianity answers: God does, through Christ, and people participate in that healing through faith.
1 Michael Glazier and Monika K. Hellwig, in The Modern Catholic Encyclopedia (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2004), 790.
Well, it’s not from a dictionary, but since it’s from an encyclopedia, it’s pretty close. And not especially useful for a non-believer.
Let’s try again, but also let’s try to get an answer from a different perspective. One that’s not solely Catholic.
Protestant/Catholic differences on soteriology
Q: I see this is a Catholic source. Does it change from a Protestant viewpoint?
🤖✨ Yes, there are substantial differences between Catholic and Protestant understandings of soteriology, though they share the core conviction that salvation comes through Christ.
The fundamental divide centers on the role of works: while Catholics view charity as indispensable for salvation through a merit-based framework, Protestants reject the connection between works and redemption, opposing what they call works-righteousness.1 This distinction produces radically different soteriologies.
Protestants affirm “faith alone,” teaching that believers are justified by grace through faith in Christ alone, with Christ’s righteousness imputed to them.2 By contrast, Catholics teach that faith must be supplemented with meritorious works, and while Christ’s righteousness is imparted to believers, it is insufficient by itself to justify them without additional good works.2
The Protestant framework makes a crucial distinction: justification is a one-time declaration of righteousness based on faith in Christ’s atonement, while sanctification is the ongoing process of becoming righteous that continues throughout life.2 Works are understood as the fruit or result of salvation, never its means.2 Catholics blend justification and sanctification into one continuous process, which Protestants argue obscures how salvation actually occurs.2
The Reformation divide between Catholicism and Protestantism traces fundamentally to differing views on salvation’s nature and means, with ongoing disagreements about grace’s role, the relationship between faith and certainty, the importance of good works, and the relationship between law and gospel.3
So the Catholic source I cited earlier reflects a merit-based soteriology quite different from the Protestant emphasis on grace alone through faith alone.
1 Carlos M. N. Eire, Reformations: The Early Modern World, 1450–1650 (New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2016), 695.
2 Got Questions Ministries, Got Questions? Bible Questions Answered (Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2002–2013). [See here, here, here, here, here, here, here.]
3 R. David Nelson and Charles Raith II, Ecumenism: A Guide for the Perplexed, Guides for the Perplexed (London; Oxford; New York; New Delhi; Sydney: Bloomsbury T&T Clark: An Imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2017), 106.
What does this mean?
Let’s try to make this really simple:
Catholics and Protestants both believe Jesus saves—but they disagree on whether anything must be added to what Jesus did.
Catholics teach that faith and good works together play a role in salvation.
Protestants teach that Jesus’ death is completely enough on its own, and that good works come after salvation as the evidence of a changed life, not the cause of it.
So the real question becomes: Do we do good works to earn salvation, or because we’ve already received it?
That means, for Protestants like me, who believe God gives us the free will to choose to accept or refuse His offer for salvation, works aren’t extra requirements—just the natural result of God’s grace already at work in your life.
For Protestants who hold Calvinist views, the only difference is the question of whether we make the choice – or if God chose us. The question on works is the same for both.
However, for Catholics, works play a role in salvation – above and beyond Jesus’ death on the cross.
The bottom line
To me, it’s kind of a two-fold question to see where our beliefs fall on this one.
First, what are the real differences between the three options?
Second, which of them sounds like the God we believe in? (If none of them do, then I respectfully suggest that you need to re-examine your view of God.)
Here’s something to help you with that. A couple verses from Paul to Timothy. Its title says it’s about worship. Today, worship is generally thought of as a part of the Sunday service. Back then, it was a way of living life. Honestly – that early church meaning should still be the one we use today.
In any case, here’s what Paul wrote:
Instructions on Worship – 1 Timothy
1Ti 2:1 I urge, then, first of all, that requests, prayers, intercession and thanksgiving be made for everyone— 2 for kings and all those in authority, that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. 3 This is good, and pleases God our Savior, 4 who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave himself as a ransom for all men—the testimony given in its proper time. 7 And for this purpose I was appointed a herald and an apostle—I am telling the truth, I am not lying— and a teacher of the true faith to the Gentiles.
…
So – what do you believe?
Footnotes:
- 1Kurian, G. T. (2001). In Nelson’s new Christian dictionary: the authoritative resource on the Christian world. Thomas Nelson Publishers.
Discover more from Which god can save?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.